The paper ” Ethical and Legal Dimensions of Janet and Mrs. Jordan Situation” is a great example of an assignment on the law. Q1aIn case 1 Janet acted illegally and unethically. Janet was negligent in carrying out her duty because she owed a duty of care to Mrs. Jordan. The duty of care was towards Mrs. Jordan’s treatment where she was supposed to give the correct medication to the patient but she gave the wrong medication by withdrawing the dopamine from the IV. She also breaches the element of legal consent. This consent was supposed to be obtained after explaining to the patient the risk associated with the withdrawal of the medication and the consequences of this. She also gives fake documentation about the cause of death of the patient where she says that the patient dies due to not responding to the medication administered to her while she wells know no medication was in the drip. Janet also oversteps her authority as a nurse by deciding on the withdrawal of the dopamine which is supposed to be done by the doctor in charge of the hospital. The action that should be taken is the family of Mrs. Jordan for her negligence which leads to the death of the patient. If they are able to prove negligence she will be forced by the courts to pay damages for the loss incurred due to loss. Q1bThe concept of cooperation and accountability was not observed in case I leading to her not meeting ethical standards. Cooperation emphasis the nurses keeping promises, making mutual concerns a priority, and sacrificing personal interest. The nurse had an agreement with the doctor that the patient was to continue to be on medication but she went forward to withdraw the medication. Janet would not account for how the death of Mrs. Jordan had occurred to the doctor because she had not met the moral standards in doing this. On the basis of Advocacy Janet does not protect the patient because the patient had not consented to withdrawal of medication. Janet goes ahead to withdraw the medication because the family suggests that they think Mrs. Jones would have agreed on with them. Janet does not try to convince the relatives on the need of keeping Mrs. Jordan alive which is her responsibility in protecting the basic human rights (William, 2000). Case 2: Q2a In this case, Janet acted legally because no act of negligence can be proved. This is because Janet observed the standard of care a nurse was supposed to observe. This is shown first by her obtaining the consent of the patient on the need for the withdrawal of medication and discussing the matter with the doctor so that she would acquire permission. Morality was observed where standards of good effect had to be intended on behalf of the patient. The patient’s health conditions were deteriorating from cardiac arrest leading to loss of consciousness making more medication to be applied to the patient which was painful leading to the need for withdrawing of medication for the good of the family and her. This comes up because Mrs. Jones was just withdrawn from treatment but not prescribing any lethal dosage to lead to the death which would be inhuman (William, 2000). Q2b The decision made by Janet in the second scenario was ethically correct. This is shown by her advocacy and caring character on behalf of the patient. She tries to communicate the desire of the patient not to be kept alive in case of her health deteriorating to the doctor showing cooperation. She also takes together with the doctor the responsibility of explaining the need of withdrawing the medication to the family members who consent to it. The pain makes the patient lose human dignity leading to the need for not keeping her on medication to prolong her life. The nurse also shows accountability of her action after withdrawing the IV because she is able to own up it. Her action was directed at alleviating suffering to the patient which was part of her responsibility (William, 2000). Critical evaluationQ3In both original and the alternative versions of the scenario, Janet withdraws dopamine and Mrs. Jordan dies as a consequence and so an act of euthanasia is performed. In this case, the nurses and physicians are left with the problem of coming up with the procedure to be carried out to achieve euthanasia. The public debate on euthanasia is trying to solve this by suggesting some changes that need to be made in the legal system. One of these is that the law should be explicit on the acts the doctor is authorized to perform in performing euthanasia like writing prescriptions, giving an injection, and the sorts of medication supposed to be given to the patient. These changes would solve the mystery between the two cases where one of them there is the withdrawal of dopamine medication together with the IV and the other one the patient is on IV without dopamine. There is also a problem in making a prognosis of the length of terminal illness in the two cases making it hard to decide if euthanasia should be carried out. Clarity of the law on when euthanizing should be carried would solve this mystery. This case arises where the patient’s family and medical fraternity feel it right to perform euthanizing on the patient without the consent of the patient due to the belief that the patient at the moment is incompetent to make the decision. If the law disallowed such a situation it would protect those people suffering from the terminal diseases from voluntary euthanizing without their concept. This would make a difference in the two scenarios because the patient in the first scenario did not give the consent but in the second case she gave the consent (Biggs, 2001)Q4 In the original version of the scenario, Janet clearly does act as an advocate for her patient, and advocacy is an ethically important role for nurses. This case does not fully qualify for advocacy because to be an advocate you should protect the basic human rights of the patient. One of the basic human rights is the right to life. At the moment the nurse was acting due to the basis of the feelings of the patient’s family members and her own feelings. This leads to her acting as an advocate of the family members and not the patients. In this case, she was supposed to discuss the case with the family members and convince them of the need of keeping the patient alive. She also did not try to oppose her colleagues who were for euthanizing the patient or change of the doctor to allow for euthanizing which was her responsibility. In the second condition the nurse acted as an advocate of the patient because she was protecting the patient’s interest. The interest of the patient was not to be kept on medication in case her condition deteriorated and Janet withdraws the medication when this happened. She also communicates the need of the patient to the doctor and convinces him of the need for euthanasia to save the patient the suffering she was going through (Jennifer and Martha, 1996). NFR writing by nursesQ5The writing of NFR is a responsibility left to the physician without any help from the nurse but they are suggesting this responsibility should be shared between a responsible physician and a responsible nurse. They are many arguments brought forward to support this like the decision of writing NFR where it regards ending the life of a patient is nonmedical. These decisions are moral and a patient is left to make them regarding his or her competence with guidance from the nurse and so also the nurse should be given the authority of accomplishing them on behalf of the patient. There is also a supporting factor that suggests that is the nurse who initiates the DNR order with the patient due to the frequent interaction between the patient and the nurse. Letting the nurse write the DNR order would let him or her achieve her advocacy responsibility. If the physician is informed of this they will discuss the matter with the patient but it becomes hard for the physician to discuss the matter with the patient due to the little time they spend with the patient during the routine visit. The nurse is left to bear the burden of initiating CPR on patients where there is no order of DNR and so the nurse should also be given the responsibility of writing the DNR if the need arises. This suggestion leaves it necessary for nurses to be involved in writing NFR so that they can avoid conflicts between the nurses and the physician on the various decisions arrived at.
Related Essay Samples
Usa patriot act
The main advantages of this act, ie, the positive consequence of this ac are: It gives level playing field to the investigating authorities with those of the law breakers / terrorists. Terrorist organizations and other law evaders take advantage of ...
Prosecutorial misconduct essay sample
How do the performance prong and the prejudice prong of the Strickland standard apply to the example? How do the performance prong and the prejudice prong of the Strickland standard apply to the example?
Rodriguez v. attorney general of british columbia
Issues: The dispute between Sue Rodriguez and the Supreme Court of British Columbia Does sections 241 of the Criminal Code infringe or deny the rights and freedoms guaranteed by subsection 7, 12, and 15 of the Charter? The questions that ...
Anti-trust
The conclusions of the new trial were, the damages incurred were not the hospital'sresponsibilitydue to lack of evidence and the settlement from the physicians was sufficient. The included doctors are somewhat slaves to the groups and will be kicked out ...
Discern the legal realtionships between landlords and tenants
Landlords and Tenants Landlords and Tenants When an individual does not own a home, the only other accepted option is to lease or rent a house to live. When a tenant or the person, who has rented the house, dies ...
The employment-at-will doctrine
The differentiation lies in the determination of the severity of the crime. Due to the nature of this crime, the good faith clause is applicable to this situation.3.
Three components to the justice system
Boyd Strayer University Douglas Brinkley The Justice System Criminal Justice is a phrase that refers to the collection of the three criminal justice systems. Corrections The third and final component of the criminal justice system is corrections.
Gender and crime essay samples
Generally in the society, men are known to commit more crimes as compared to women due to the various characteristics and the difference in the roles of these two genders. As aforementioned, this paper is going to discuss three major ...
The role and nature of statutory tribunals law employment essay
Both parties have a right to ask for a review of the decision and a right to appeal against the tribunal's decision, on a question of law, to the Employment Appeal Tribunal. Information on how to apply for a review ...
The background of fadbury law european essay
Directives are aimed to a member states and they are required to achieved results that have been specified, directives are not directly applicable this means that member state have implement the law, before it because a part of the law ...
Legal validity of living relationship essay sample
The Magistrate should send a copy of the order for monetary relief to both parties, and to the officer in charge of the police station within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the respondent resides. Position Of Live-In Relationships Abroad ...
Sheppard v maxwell landmark case
Maxwell Landmark Case In a democratic society, the Supreme Court has noted, the press fulfills the important function of informing the public about the judicial process. In doing so, the Court takes judicial notice of the directives to trial courts ...
Free essay about password attacks
It is very important for users to understand the importance of password security and imply it to their computer systems. It is also beneficial to make your password a combination of numbers, letters and special characters.
Law portrays antony
Another set of facts shows that Antony was able to keep his business appointment and in the process he was angered because the Queens company were not interested in his terms of contact and as a result he held a ...
Free essay on why evolution is true: an exploration
It was here in the first chapter that I realized that I had a major misunderstanding about the theory of evolution. This engine is adaptation to the environment and to all of the other species in the environment.
Technology evaluation plan case study examples
However, since this is an emerging technology, meaning not a lot of people are using it yet, or at least today, there are still a lot of things that have to be uncovered about autonomous cars and that would be ...
Example of essay on the bombing of the us embassy and the killing of the us ambassador
I also wish to send my message of condolences to the families and friends of the victims of this outrageous attack. This technology requires anybody travelling to US to give prints of two fingers and a copy of the digital ...
Carol hoffman’s murder case study
Sitting in the living room enabled her to have a clear view of all the rooms in the house thus putting her in a position to intercept the children if any of them woke up and headed to the bathroom ...
Example of essay on rape is always wrong
Rape is one of the forms of sexual assault, which is carried out by one or many people without the consent of the victim. Rape is actually a wrong because the offender is well aware of the harm that causes ...
Goals and objectives of the department of homeland security
Goals and Objectives of the Department of Homeland Security The main aim of the Department of Homeland Security is to make sure that the nation is protected, secure as well as tough in opposition to terrorist activities along with ...
Free case study on computer security
The issue of security on home personal computers would not be much of a challenge if each individual were to be isolated and not connected to any form of a network where there other computer like the internet. Some of ...
Free essay on singaporean laws
The Singapore law regarding graffiti and vandalism does not exist as part of the treaty. The anti-graffiti law does not limit the freedoms and rights of the individuals.
Free essay on the four functions of law
The main aim of a law is to regulate how the people conduct themselves. The people who break this law, for example, terrorists, have to be tried in a court of law.
The issues caused by uninsured people
But lately, because of the recession, many people living in the United States have become unemployed because of which they are unable to renew their insurance packages. The government should also devise a mechanism to make the treatment of these ...
Detecting and mitigating attacks on applications
It is advisable that the implementation of the patches be made simple to reduce complexity in their testing and management which are some of the problematic areas in using patches. By providing flexibility, the patches ensure a system that can ...