Lord Nicholls, thereby, gathered together the nineteenth century trust law precedents and reformulated them as a loss based ‘ accessory’ liability that attaches to a third party who procures or assists in any breach of trust by the fiduciary. Moreover, from the twentieth century trust law precedents he identified a requirement of ‘ dishonesty’ on the part of the third party. This case also has created complexity as for the meaning for dishonesty in this context. The facts of the case are, the Royal Brunei airline contracted an agency agreement with a travel agency, BLT, which under the agreement BLT was to sell tickets for the airlines. Therefore, BLT held the money received for the sale of these tickets on express trust for appellant in a current account. Commonly, the current account was used to defray some of BLT’s expenses, such as salaries and to reduce its overdraft. BLT was account to the appellant to those moneys within thirty days. The respondent, Tan, was the managing director and principle shareholder of BLT. From time to time amounts were paid out of the current account into deposit accounts controlled by Tan. BLT held the proceeds of the sale of tickets as trustee for the appellant. In time, BLT went into insolvency. Therefore, the appellant sought to proceed against Tan for knowingly assisting in a breach of trust. The issue arose was ‘ whether the breach of trust which is a prerequisite to accessory liability must itself be a dishonest and fraudulent breach of the trust by trustee’[3]. Therefore, Lord Nicholls held that a breach of trust by a trustee need not have been a dishonest act on the part of the trustee. Rather, it is sufficient that an accessory has acted dishonestly for that accessory to be fixed with personal liability for the breach. This has created a test of dishonesty. The element of state of mind of the trustee was held irrelevant. Therefore, the nature of the test for dishonesty in this context, Lord Nicholls held that[4]:‘… acting dishonestly, or with a lack of probity, which is synonymous, means simply not acting as an honest person would in the circumstance. This is an objective standard.’Therefore, the test requires the court to ask is not what the defendant thought personally, but rather what an honest person would have done if they had been placed in the similar situation as the defendant. The remainder of this judgment clearly held that dishonesty in this context covers situations in which there has been either ‘ fraud, or a lack of probity or some reckless risk-taking’[5]which calls the defendant’s honesty into question. This doctrine has been expanded by Lord Nicholls in this case as in the Privy Council explicitly in the area of advisors in investment transactions, to the effect that:‘ All investment involves risk. Imprudence is not dishonesty, although imprudence may be carried recklessly to lengths which call into question the honesty of the person making the decision. This is especially so if the transaction serves another purpose in which that person has an interest of his own’.[6]It can be concluded from the statement that, if an advisor promotes a course of action which is considered by the court to have been reckless, then that will contribute to the advisor being found to have been ” dishonest” in a conventionalize meaning of that word in this context. There is no other interpretation which may be found on these words in the context of his lordship’s view. Lord Nicholls was stating plainly about investment and intentionally advocating an extension of liability. Moreover, ‘ the test for recklessness leading to dishonesty may be derived from failing to act in accordance with common market practice for that type of client and thus may be derived from financial regulation of the appropriate market’[7]. The test is an objective test means that regulatory standards are appropriate to decide what an honest investment advisor ought to have done in the circumstances. In Twinsectra Ltd v Yardley[8], dishonesty has a subjective element. The defendant must know that his conduct would be regarded as dishonest by honest people. However, after some confusion generated by the House of Lords in this case, the Privy Council confirmed in Barlow Clowes v Eurotrust[9]that dishonesty was to be determined according to an objective standard[10]. Besides, Lord Nicholls’ reasoning in Royal Brunei, focuses upon liability for breach of an express trust and, specifically, the liability of agents acting for trustees, although in his concluding remarks he refers to a breach of trust or fiduciary obligation. Much of his reasoning makes sense only in the context of express trusts. The ambit of liability is considerably widened by the fact that breaches of fiduciary duty by company directors also are treated as instances of breach of trust on the basis that the company property is treated as trust property. Further, in Royal Brunei, Lord Nicholls explicitly moved away from a close reading of the case law because, in his view, this approach was responsible for many of the problems besetting this area of law. Specifically, he ditched the traditional precedent of Barnes v Addy[11], on the ground that it had been applied as though it were a statute, and ‘ this approach has been inimical to analysis of the underlying concept’[12]. He then considered the matter as one of principle, taking into account all case law on third parties and breach of trust, whether binding or not. The case law was used at two steps in his reasoning. First, the nineteenth century cases involving third parties and breach of trust were referred to in order to highlight an apparently illogical element in the reasoning of Lord Selborne in Barnes that directed attention to the trustee breach of trust’s state of mind in order to determine whether third party should be liable. Lord Nicholls pointed to the handful of trust cases contemporaneous with Barnes in which a dishonest and fraudulent breach was not required where a stranger had procured, rather than assisted, the breach of trust by Fiduciary. This apparent inconsistency in the precedents presented an opportunity to reconsider the underlying concept of participatory liability in relation to breach of trust. The highlighting of these cases by Lord Nicholls was a significant innovation for they had been overlooked by many judges and scholars. Secondly, the twentieth century Barnes case law was discussed in relation to the touchstone for stranger’s liability. In considering the relevant law, Lord Nicholls drew on the decisions of judges in other jurisdictions as well as academic commentary. He used the twentieth century cases to extract a requirement of ‘ dishonesty’ on the part of stranger, although most of those cases did not use that terminology. Under Lord Nicholls’ approach, the detail of individual cases was given much less prominence in the reasoning process, instead, the precedents were balanced with a normative inquiry as to when third parties dealing with trustees should be subjected to equitable liability. In this context, he considered scenarios that were particularly problematic in the twentieth century Barnes case law such as where D’s conduct had been either careless or reckless. Lord Nicholls’ judgment in Royal Brunei, is a model of senior appellate court reasoning. The strength of the judgment is that it seeks to explain, as well as expound, the relevant law. But the accessory liability principle arrived at by Lord Nicholls in Royal Brunei, is flawed because his choice of relevant equitable precedents was too narrow in that he confined himself to considering cases in which there was a breach of trust. This suggests that Lord Nicholls in Royal Brunei, incorrectly conflated two distinct forms of liability into ‘ accessory liability’ and that his policy discussion, whilst directed to ‘ pure agents’, was given in a case that did not involve that scenario. A proper understanding of the relevant equitable precedents opens the way for a more soundly based legal principle to be formulated.
Related Essay Samples
Analysis of valet ticket
The purpose of this paper is to explain the strengths and weakness of a valet ticket in terms of its legality. If a car is damaged or a person is injured while is in the hotel, the initial question is ...
Colomo vs bonds – what sexual harassment really is
The court was issued with the accounts of the meetings where Fuller had taken Colomo to seclusion within the school and asked her to be his girlfriend and in the process touched her inappropriately. However, the student had maintained stable ...
The role of the gulf cooperation council of arab states to members in order to achieve thesis examples
In order to understand the role the GCC portrays in the application of the MDGs, it is crucial to understand how experts see the GCC on implementing or monitoring its policies. In an economic perspective, the GCC's implementation and monitoring ...
Controversial topic essay sample
On February 11, 2003, the State of Arkansas was given permission to force prisoner, Charles Laverne Singleton, to take medicine to make him sane enough to be executed for felony capital murder. SUPPORT When it comes to medicine regardless of ...
The difference sentencing models
Deterrence is the act or process of discouraging and preventing an action from occurring. The possibility of execution would give a potential pause in the thought process of the murderer, using fear as an incentive for preventing recurrence or quite ...
The importance of public notice of retirement law company business partnership essay
The mode of discharging a retiring partner from liability in terms of future acts which, if done before his retirement, would have been considered to be the acts of the firmWho may give the public notice of retirement referred to ...
Example of controlling crime term paper
Florida is one of the states with the highest crime rate in the United States of America. Florida is considered one of the states with the highest crime ration in the country.the statistic shows that both violence and property crimes ...
American criminal justice system
There are serious deficits in the American criminal justice system with regards to the mentally ill. This outsourcing has been very unsuccessful in helping improve the situation of the mentally ill with regards to the criminal justice system.
Prepare a 500-750 word explaining the importance of screening in the hiring essays example
Screening is a vital part of the hiring process of law enforcement for various reasons that include determining important aspects necessary for the recruitment of best-fit officers into the agencies. Other important roles of the screening are where the process ...
What are the advantages and disadvantages of the current jury system in the uk
The Advantages and Disadvantages of the Current Jury System in the UK The UK jury system has its share of advantages and disadvantages. In addition, other court personnel are employed for the purposes of ministering to the jury during all ...
Term paper of mngt 2410 spring 2012 online course
In the narrow sense, given contract is the consensus of parties to the contract in nature, contract law is deemed as the law implementing the promise and agreement of parties involved." The core of contract law is the exchange of ...
The concept of fiduciary relationships law equity essay
Trust Law although originating from the Courts of Equity in response to the sometimes harsh result of strict application of the common law, and as a result of tax avoidance schemes of the feudal system, is now governed in Ireland ...
The cause of death vs. the gift of life article review sample
It has been discussed how this enhancement in the amount of conflict is caused by the emergence of technological advancements that have the paramount capacity of transforming the domains of expertise of people of the society. The author goes on ...
Why is discretion important in the criminal process
Since discretion is a function of judgment, fairness must be the guideline judges use to admit evidence and make decisions. All decisions and judgments prescribed by the law are chosen through a process of discretion in a manner that will ...
Criminal justice system these agencies work together assignment
These people consist of, the judge, the prosecutor, and the defense attorney. It is the defense attorneys job to represent the interests of the client and hold the prosecution to its burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
What is criminal justice
A crime is committed when a person has violated the law by the state, federal government and local jurisdiction system and cannot be justified. Criminological theory is an explanation of the causes of crime and how it is connected within ...
Example of arrest and custody: peeping tom essay
Any person who is to be used as a witness in the case is to have seen the suspect and to also be of sound mind. There should be a complete search of the suspect's home to ensure that all ...
Property services real estate law land property essay
The final decision as to who rents the property will be made by the landlord based on the advice provided to them by me. Therefore, I must establish if the tenant's applying to lease the property can: Pay the rent; ...
Free florida homestead law research paper sample
If the judgment is obtained against the owner of homestead property, Florida homestead exemption laws provide that the holder of such judgment will not be able to enforce it against the property designated as " homestead". Under Florida law, a ...
The impact of merger on employees rights law european essay
In order to protect employees' rights which could be impacted in the context of some restructurings of their employer, Article 12 of Directive 78/855/EEC of 9 October 1978 concerning mergers of public limited liability companies and Article 11 of Directive ...
Free critical thinking about hate crimes and homophia: questions
Thus crimes motivated by the victim's sexual orientation are not just a manifestation of the bias, but a dangerous action motivated by a strong bias. Explicit inclusion of ' crimes motivated by sexual orientation' in the legal definition of hate ...
Critical thinking assignment # 3
Regardless of the reasons, the rationale for solitary confinement does not justify the means because it is wrong and ineffective. According to Cole, Smith, and DeJong, the rationale of solitary confinement is that it serves as a form of punishment ...
Criminal theory
This is because the main aim of private prisons is to make profits at the expense of the incarceration of young, black, non-violent, drug offenders. The drug war is an act of racism because it has been used by those ...
Currie v misa
Her employer promised her last week a bonus of 100 pounds to be paid at the end of the week. Is Megan entitled to claim the bonus as promised by her employer?
Process safety and loss prevention plant engineering essay
I?-1 Here I? = form factor I = characteristic life I? = location parametric quantity T = lasting a clip Equation for the dependability: R = e- /I ) ^6 [ 3 ] Failure rate of shaft break = 0. ...